Are neuroscientists risking scientific integrity for funding?

    Are neuroscientists who finance their research through military grants
and the sales of brain-fitness software selling their souls? In a guest blog for Scientific American, John Horgan discusses his concerns over these latest funding trends in the neuroscience field.

notes that just a few years ago, neuroscientists were reluctant to
discuss their involvement in neuroweapons research, yet last year the
National Academy of Sciences published a report
highlighting the many opportunities for neuroscience to be used in army
applications. “Will the militarization of neuroscience really make the
world safer, or just trigger a new arms race?” Horgan asks.

on another level is the growing prevalence of brain-fitness software
aimed at baby-boomers and touting benefits in learning and memory.
According to Horgan, the “neurobics” industry earned $265 million in
2008, despite the fact that the benefits derived from the software have
not been proven to be more powerful than simply playing cards with friends or taking a walk.

concludes with the question, “should [neuroscientists] adhere to higher
ethical standards than defense contractors and infomercial pitchmen?”

    –Ann L. Whitman

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: